Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Cari Blog Ini

Julian Assanges Extradition Case Us Assurances Rejected

**

Julian Assange's Extradition Case: US Assurances Rejected

**

High Court Denies Assange's Appeal, Extends Legal Battle

**

Assange's Fate Uncertain as Appeal Process Continues

**

Julian Assange's legal fight against extradition to the United States has taken a significant turn following the recent ruling by the High Court in London. The court rejected Assange's appeal against extradition, granting permission for the US to proceed with legal proceedings. This marks a major setback in Assange's efforts to avoid prosecution on espionage charges.

The 52-year-old Australian-born activist faces 18 charges under the Espionage Act related to WikiLeaks' mass release of classified US documents in 2010. The US alleges that Assange's actions compromised national security and put lives at risk. Assange has denied wrongdoing, claiming that WikiLeaks' actions were in the public interest.

During the extradition hearing, the US government provided assurances that Assange would not be subjected to harsh treatment or held under inhumane conditions. However, the High Court found these assurances to be insufficient, citing concerns about Assange's mental and physical health. The court also noted that the US has a history of mistreating prisoners in its detention facilities, including those with mental health issues.

Despite the setback, Assange has the right to appeal the High Court's decision to the Supreme Court. His legal team is expected to argue that the High Court erred in its assessment of the US assurances and that Assange's extradition would violate his human rights.

The extradition case has drawn international attention and sparked debates about freedom of speech, press freedom, and the US government's crackdown on whistleblowers. Assange's supporters maintain that his extradition would set a dangerous precedent and stifle the free flow of information.

As the legal battle continues, Julian Assange remains under enormous pressure. The outcome of his appeal could have a profound impact on his life and the future of whistleblowing and investigative journalism.


Comments